Creationism vs Evolution royal battle

In this entry I'd like to talk about something else. I don't want to write down actual arguments of any side of this conflict(?). I'd like to describe some interesting things about this fight, instead.

First of all it's the very reason of this conflict. Why either of the sides wants to be the right side? Someone's got to be right, somebody is out of mind. And it must be US who are right. Why? It's not important, what our opinion is, it's our opinion, so we just can't  be wrong. Remember, when you last time swore on your mother's death, that you didn't left your keys in your car? You were so sure, you are right. Still, those keys got to your car by some unexplainable miracle. We are so headstrong when it gets to our opinions, we just have to fight for our beliefs. It just like if you had last edible food and someone would try to steal it from you. You would fight to your death for it. So what we are doing, when arguing against our opponent(even in this discussion) is simply fighting for the calmness of our very own being. Fighting for brighter place under the sun, since we are the ones, who are right and deserve it. Just this reason looks very silly to begin such epic fight, to begin with.

Other than that, either are we atheist, or theists, we all believe, that our arguments are strong actually. That's just not the case. Neither atheist or theists have good arguments and the reason is quite simple. Most of these people aren't educated in physics therefore in Big Bang theory(because it's lot of math to this theory, it's more about numbers, than words) neither the evolution theory, which is being still examined as well as big bang theory. Both of these great theories are not fully explained, both have holes in them. But it's sad, atheists don't want to understand that and that theists just don't understand these holes and therefore their arguments are actually out of place, because they get misinformed by print medias, which almost never speak truth. What they call holes of these great theories are mere canards and neither of them is real. Atheists on the other hand are so headstrong, they just don't want to accept, big bang and evolution are not ultimatively correct explanations to what really happend.

Just accept it. You are no scientist, no quantum physicist, you don't understand the modern evolution theory. It's completely unrelevant if you are theist or atheist. Real scientists are not to jump to quick conlusions to questions like afterlife, telephaty or anything like that. They just don't know. They just say it's less probable, to be able to communicate telephaticaly as there's just no evidence to such ability in known world. Neither is there any evidence to afterlife. What i say to afterlife is, there's no way such thing could occur, but that's only my opinion, as there is no evidence to such a thing as a soul. But still, that doesn't scientificaly deny the possibility of existence of soul. We can't just say that mathematical problem is unnegotiable only because we are unable to solve it, right? When you happen to argue with somebody about creationism vs evolution, just remember this fact. You simply don't know almost anything about big bang or evolution. It's the fact. Just face it.

The other interesting thing about this battle is, that despite atheists being totaly outnumbered by theists, still their arguments overwhelm those of theists. Just try to google something about creationism vs evolution and what you will find are almost all atheistic websites and articles written by atheists. I personaly am atheist and write such articles and it feels like being a spartan warrior at Thermopylae battle. It's not so dangerous, though. Well... to this point.. No handgrenades thrown to my room through window until now.

Theists still use the same arguments though. I mean, wherever you live and whatever type of theist you argue with, all of them would say radiometric dating is not appropriate, all of them still do think, we come from monkeys according to evolution theory etc. It's really funny, they all attack those parts of scientific view on what happened, all of these are nothing but cannards, however.

The other thing is, it's atheists, who want to bring up fire. Atheists are attacking theists today(unlike in the past, when atheists were being hunted as misbelievers). The coin's turned to the other side, it's atheists, who are "hunting" theists and forcing them to arguments. I find this part really sad, because if we atheists are right(and we hell know, we are right), why to act like bunch of idiots? Well whatever, everybody has their own conscience.

And what is more, any of the discussion on these theme ends up with total mess, which is created by the losing side of the argument. For me quarrels like these bring nothing good to this world, there are no results of such discussion(there can't be), still it's somehow attracting us to argue, we just like it, don't we?